 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Best guns for super heavy .177 pellets |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:28 pm |
|
|
| Verado |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 26 Nov 2009 |
| Posts: 70 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:36 pm |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
| Quote: |
| are they to heavy for a Quest 1000 |
My guess is yes, they may even cause spring damage.... You would only get 500-550 fps with it....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:39 pm |
|
|
| Verado |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 26 Nov 2009 |
| Posts: 70 |
|
|
|
 |
| I was wondering if these would be more suited to a PCP then a springer. Im going to stay around 7.5g-11.0g for my pellet choices. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 6:54 pm |
|
|
| Juggernaut0504 |
| Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 03 Dec 2009 |
| Posts: 44 |
|
|
|
 |
from what I know (which isn't really a lot ) heavier pellets are more well suited for PCP and CO2 AG's |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:01 pm |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
Don't heavy pellets make for a better build up of pressure or something along that line?
I was always told that I should shoot heavy pellets in my .177 magnum springers.  |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:32 pm |
|
|
| Slavia |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2008 |
| Posts: 4382 |
| Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA |
|
|
 |
| Quote: |
| My guess is yes, they may even cause spring damage |
Piston slam with light pellets is pretty intuitive; what would be the mechanism whereby an ultra heavy pellet would damage the spring? I have read that elsewhere, but I don't understand the physics involved. |
|
_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:50 pm |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
I have to admit, I just repeated what I had read, here....
You're right, I can think of no reason a heavy pellet could damage a spring.... on the other hand, I have first hand experience with light pellets ruining the firing cycle bigtime.... My Phantom/Quest really disliked anything under 13.5 grains....
Sorry for shooting from the lip, there.... don't know what I was thinking....
OK, I wasn't thinking....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:52 pm |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
On the other hand, he was looking for pellets for "long range".... In a Quest where they might hit 550 fps at best.... they would have a real rainbow of a trajectory.... so not a good choice for "long range"....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 8:07 pm |
|
|
| sniper |
| Silver Status Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 28 Nov 2008 |
| Posts: 3752 |
| Location: Star, Idaho |
|
|
 |
i sent my gamo 440 in for a respring back in the 90's under warranty and gamo told me heavy pellets can cause excessive spring wear...
but who wants to believe gamo....  |
|
_________________ I believe in gun control,
If there's a gun around I
want to be controlling it....... |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:38 pm |
|
|
| Slavia |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2008 |
| Posts: 4382 |
| Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA |
|
|
 |
| Quote: |
| Sorry for shooting from the lip, there.... don't know what I was thinking.... |
I wasn't questioning the validity of your argument, since I also had read it elsewhere. This is what I read (by Charliedatuna in the "do's and don'ts section of his site):
"They can cause damage and spring fatigue beginning with just a few shots and when disassembled, the damage caused by heavy pellets and detonation is easily detected and identifiable." He doesn't supply any explanation, except for mentioning heavy pellets and detonation in the same sentence.
On the other hand, you have Tom Gaylord, who says this:
"Some people feel heavy pellets also damage mainsprings. I don't believe this myself, but as I said, there isn't much to go on."
http://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2006/02/best-pellets-for-diana-rws-52-how-to.html
and..
"Heavy pellets will not damage a mainspring, but I think very lightweight ones might."
http://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2006/04/can-you-keep-clean-barrel-with-crosman.html
Gaylord asserts that using heavy pellets will have consequences in accuracy and efficiency. Accuracy because a heavy pellet is longer, and therefore might not be matched to the twist rate of a barrel meant for shorter pellets. Efficiency because of "piston bounce."
http://www.pyramydair.com/blog/2006/09/piston-bounce-when-is-pellet-just.html
With a very light pellet, the pellet starts moving before the piston reaches the end of the cylinder, and less pressure is developed. With a very heavy pellet the piston bounces off a cushion of air before the pellet starts moving, so when the pellet moves it does so under less pressure. Somewhere in the middle is the ideal (most efficient) pellet that moves just as the piston reaches the end of its stroke.
It seems to me that with either the ideal or the heavy pellet, the maximum pressure (and therefore temperature) would be the same, so the risk of dieseling ("detonation") would be the same.
Bob, I agree completely about the "rainbow" trajectory of a very heavy pellet.
So if you made it this far, what's my point? Like always, you try different pellets until you find one with the accuracy/efficiency to do the job intended. |
|
_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | from a old post I have |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:08 pm |
|
|
| T191032 |
| Veteran Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 30 Dec 2009 |
| Posts: 100 |
| Location: VA |
|
|
 |
Eu Jins, best suited for the PCP airguns, from my understanding.
I've got a post from Russ Best, dated back in 2002, which stated :
"In .177 stay between 7.3 and 9 grains
In .22, stay between 11 and 15.5 grains"
as mentioned, piston slam, toasting seals, etc. is mentioned. He works on 'em, I don't. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|