 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Is is smooth to be rough ? |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:56 am |
|
|
| diipii |
| Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 09 Jan 2010 |
| Posts: 16 |
| Location: Worcestershire, UK |
|
|
 |
In nature surfaces travelling through air or water are less than perfectly polished. E.g. feathers, scales and even golf balls are dimpled.
I think this creates a boundary layer of turbulence that lubricates the surface through the surrounding environment.
Has any one experimented with roughened or dimpled pellets or bullets to achieve better aerodynamics ?
Conversely, has polishing to a fine gloss been found advantageous ? |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:00 pm |
|
|
| Alstone |
| Moderator & Site Supporter |

 |
 |
| Joined: 01 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 4139 |
| Location: Linconshire, ENGLAND |
|
|
 |
Birds feathers I’m not sure about, but on dimpled golf balls it gives lift to the shot and increases range. Whereas on a pellet you don’t want this, it would increase the trajectory arc thus increasing the flight time, and reducing the impact energy, at least for hunting.
To my way of thinking.
BTW Welcome to AirGunHome. Nice to see another Brit around here.
Al |
|
_________________
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 2:59 pm |
|
|
| domer_pyle |
| Senior Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2009 |
| Posts: 523 |
|
|
|
 |
| some pellets have ridges that run along the length of the skirt but i couldn't tell you if they make a difference or not. all the pellets i've ever used have had smooth skirts |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 5:51 pm |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
I think you will find that wherever nature uses a textured surfaces.... the reason has to do with Reynold's Number.... which is basically the scaling effect of how a fluid flows around an object due to it's size and speed.... Large objects moving fast have high Rn while small objects moving slow have low Rn.... The Rn has a huge effect on drag.... and there is a critical region at about Rn=50,000 where the flow changes from laminar to turbulent.... A 1/4" long pellet travelling at 375 fps is right at 50,000.... so for most pellets and velocities, the flow is turbulent.... and surface ridges, etc., have little effect....
In nature, if the ridges / surface roughness are on a small object travelling slowly.... they are likely there to induce turbulent flow where there isn't any.... because laminar flow at low Rn tends to have a lot of drag.... Once the object gets big enough and moving fast enough that the Rn is over 50,000, small surface imperfections (such as feathers) tend to be below the turbulent boundary layer and simply don't matter....
The boundary layer gets thinner as Rn increases.... so once you are looking at an airplane at higher speeds (with a wing several feet in chord, Rn in the millions).... then things change again....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|