Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page
Argentina Australia Belgium Canada Chile Denmark France Germany Greece India
Italy Mexico New Zealand Netherlands Norway Russian Federation South Africa Spain Turkey United Kingdom United States
AirGunHome.com: THE Worldwide Airgun Forum


AirGunSeals.com Main Page Link
Air Gun Home Forum Index Register FAQ Memberlist Search

Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics » Diana magnum 350 VS 460 !! Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Post new topic  Reply to topic View previous topic :: View next topic 
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:14 pm Reply with quote
Rogerflat
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 2051
Yeah, but I think a fox pelt has some instrinsic value to it. I suppose if you are not in the business of skinning and tanning then you wouldn't want to burden yourself with that, but I know that if I killed an animal as large as a fox and saw it laying there in the trash with just its tale chopped off....I wouldn't feel good about it.

I mean I kill birds all the time. I've stuck a whole family of dead birds I shot in a grocery bag and thrown it in the dumpster like it was yesterday's garbage. But I also drive past smashed bird carcasses on the road all the time, and see their carcasses laying dead in any number of random places. Birds are almost like insects in their multitude and are plentiful and insignificant. But how many foxes could possibly be in your woods? Especially when they are being hunted just for the tips of their tails?

_________________
I done been assisted by the trees and rivers. Never needed any minister to figure my divinity.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:06 pm Reply with quote
broommaster2000
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 5714
Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
I think I agree with Roger here. Something the size of a Fox being hunted, one should definately try and use the resources given by such an animal.

_________________
BIG GAP
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:40 pm Reply with quote
Old Pa
Member
Member
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 36
Location: Northwoods
I like seeing foxes out in the woods. Something about their manner and their eyes reminds me of dogs, of other predators. Maybe it's professional courtesy. Smile

Through the winter and into the Spring before the misquitoes come out, I take my two spaniel girls for a long walk each night after supper. Along that two and a half mile route this Spring, there was a wooded area where, despite some close houses, we saw a litter of fox kits playing. Cute as buttons, they were ruckusing with each other each evening. Over the next couple of weeks, we watched them grow. My spaniels listen to me and stayed away from the kits, just watched with great interest. Then the kits weren't there any more. I remember hoping they were okay.

But while the fox kits were there, I had absolutely no thought of killing any of them. Sure, foxes can be destructive and hard on poultry, but these little guys weren't bothering anyone.

BTW, the red squirrels I was discussing earlier had chewed their way into my attic and taken up residency. That's something I could not tolerate.

_________________
Doing my duty . . . the way I see it.

"The trouble with most people is not what they don't know, but what they know for certain that isn't true."
Mark Twain
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:48 pm Reply with quote
cissp22
Member
Member
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 63
i think im convinced ...

yaaa ..foxes are oppressed du to their pelts and tail ,but not rare in our area ...now a days they are so few hunters for unlawful to eat & pelt huntings.

in real challenge i feel more offended when shooting a groundhog rather than a fox ...maybe because of an innocent view of that !!

i should work on myself ...it seems that i should better hunt abundant&harmful animals.

thanks@all.
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:48 pm Reply with quote
Rogerflat
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 2051
Old Pa, I respect your story and the experience you had with the fox pups, but because an animal is small or cute or not immediately doing something that you find destructive does not mean it is any better or worse than any other animal. My girlfriend tells me "Birds are so small and cute, why do you kill them?" You can't justify or condemn hunting with a sentimental mindset like that.

I've never been impressed by people's babies, getting sappy and all that and making the googly faces and crap. I just look at them as smaller humans. Whether I'm cold or calous or don't impress easy...maybe all of the above. But not being influenced by things that are superficial like that enables you to regard the less than "cute" things in life with the same accord.

_________________
I done been assisted by the trees and rivers. Never needed any minister to figure my divinity.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 7:19 pm Reply with quote
Old Pa
Member
Member
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 36
Location: Northwoods
Rogerflat wrote:
Old Pa, I respect your story and the experience you had with the fox pups, but because an animal is small or cute or not immediately doing something that you find destructive does not mean it is any better or worse than any other animal. My girlfriend tells me "Birds are so small and cute, why do you kill them?" You can't justify or condemn hunting with a sentimental mindset like that.

I've never been impressed by people's babies, getting sappy and all that and making the googly faces and crap. I just look at them as smaller humans. Whether I'm cold or calous or don't impress easy...maybe all of the above. But not being influenced by things that are superficial like that enables you to regard the less than "cute" things in life with the same accord.

I must have said it wrong, because I'm completely in agreement with most of your statement. Without beating things to death, and with a hope for a little commonality, consider this: I was not being sentimental or cute about the fox kits, I was enjoying "nature" after a long Winter. And, red squirrels are damn cute; just not in my attic. Sorry for not expressing myself clearly; let's not fight when there's nothing to fight about.

_________________
Doing my duty . . . the way I see it.

"The trouble with most people is not what they don't know, but what they know for certain that isn't true."
Mark Twain
View user's profile Send private message
Re: Diana magnum 350 VS 460 !! 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:48 pm Reply with quote
Ed Krzynowek
Member
Member
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 17
cissp22 wrote:

i have Diana magnum 350 in .22 and i shoot many foxes around 50 yards and cleankill them it shoot 15,43gr around 900 fps (~28fpe)...this is one of the best powerfull/accurate rifles ..

diana magnum 460 has realy better touch , i want to know if anyone here have used magnum460 ? i heard it has less power comparing to 350 ..but better view and feel ....

if anyone has used 460 plz inform me of their claims ..i dont want to replace/upgrade it to 460 and become unhappy Sad/Cry..i wish it reached 25fpe or so) ...(fpe/fps of websites are almost wrong)..real users plzz...

waiting for responces,Thx.


Based on actual tuning and test results, the 460 is good for ~24 FPE or so in .22 caliber. You will need a breech seal re-inforcement/upgrade to maintain a good seal at the breech, but that doesn't cost much.

If velocity alone is your measure of the rifle's success, however, the 350 may make you happier. It may only beat the 460 by 15 fps, which isn't enough to make any difference in the real world, but it may matter to those who judge their rifle based by the reading on their chrony.

Bottom line: Both the 350 and 460 are very-high-impact magnum air rifles.

_________________
Happy Shooting,

Ed
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:58 pm Reply with quote
23ib0d0n
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 757
How about the Diana 52? Twisted Evil
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:14 am Reply with quote
cissp22
Member
Member
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 63
thanks Ed Krzynowek ...

well when hunting medium-size animals like fox or so ..it gives me more confidence shooting with (higher fps) air rifle...but i 100% agree with u ...i also feel much better with 460 and others rather than 350 (very bad hand touch) ...realy hard too mange 350 du to its lenght ..

i was thinking of Gamo hunter Extreme 1600 in .22 or .17 ...any body has ever used ?

<23ib0d0n>.....WOW ur Scope impressed me more !!! ..how far do u shoot and ur group size plz? :>..do u have any chrono of ur rifle ?
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Re: Diana magnum 350 VS 460 !! 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:25 am Reply with quote
Old Pa
Member
Member
Joined: 04 Aug 2008
Posts: 36
Location: Northwoods
Ed Krzynowek wrote:
Based on actual tuning and test results, the 460 is good for ~24 FPE or so in .22 caliber.


With what pellet weight was this @24FPE result in a 460 obtained?

_________________
Doing my duty . . . the way I see it.

"The trouble with most people is not what they don't know, but what they know for certain that isn't true."
Mark Twain
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:35 am Reply with quote
AirGunEric
Site Admin
Site Admin
Joined: 20 Jan 2007
Posts: 6930
Location: "Out There"
cissp22 wrote:
thanks Ed Krzynowek ...

well when hunting medium-size animals like fox or so ..it gives me more confidence shooting with (higher fps) air rifle...


Don't buy into the "Gamo argument"- where more fps makes for a better gun. Look at actual energy output- not velocity numbers. You're far better off being able to make a well-placed shot than trying to beat the animal down with brute force.

_________________
`

I'd say "I care."

But I'd be lying.


Canadian Airgun Supplier: http://www.scopesandammo.com/storefront
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:04 pm Reply with quote
cissp22
Member
Member
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 63
thanks AirGunEric
thast exactly what i get through..

i saw a video in Youtube , the guy lost a Gopher with its .22 Hornet centerfire with middle stomach shot placement in 150 yards !! ...this rifle has over 300FPE also after 200 yards ! but it may have been killed clean with air rifle with better shot placement also in 150 yards (headshot)..
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 1:29 pm Reply with quote
23ib0d0n
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 21 May 2007
Posts: 757
I'm pretty sure the velocity Mr Krzynowek is talking about, is useful trajectory, as opposed to Gamo PBA hype velocity.
He does know a l'il bit about bbguns . . . Twisted Evil

< This rig

took a ride to Lavon, Texas

and won shooting against a JW75 and a TX200SR . . . Giant Grin
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:36 pm Reply with quote
Rogerflat
Silver Status Member
Silver Status Member
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 2051
Quote:
i saw a video in Youtube , the guy lost a Gopher with its .22 Hornet centerfire with middle stomach shot placement in 150 yards !! ...this rifle has over 300FPE also after 200 yards ! but it may have been killed clean with air rifle with better shot placement also in 150 yards (headshot)..


They got ones on there where the guys are hunting prarie dogs with 50 cals and those things explode and go flying like you wouldn't believe. How many thousands of fpe they prduce I have no idea. But some of the indirect hits the animal would make them run or stumble a bit before they were shot again. And no, those dudes weren't going for head shots.

_________________
I done been assisted by the trees and rivers. Never needed any minister to figure my divinity.
View user's profile Send private message
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:16 pm Reply with quote
broommaster2000
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 5714
Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Oh Dianas are real Diamonds in the rough. They are pretty good to start with, but after a good tuning, they'll beat the rifles named by J, I can second that.

However, the pricetag is also pretty high.

_________________
BIG GAP
View user's profile Send private message
Diana magnum 350 VS 460 !! 
  Air Gun Home Forum Index » General Air Gun Questions and Topics
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
All times are GMT - 5 Hours  
Page 2 of 3  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
  
  
 Post new topic  Reply to topic  

Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.


Click Here for AirGunHome.com Main Page


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2004 phpBB Group
Partial Styling Supplied by Vjacheslav Trushkin Themes Database.