 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | Getting a little more punch out of a springer. |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 12:47 pm |
|
|
| jlwilliams |
| Veteran Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 02 Oct 2009 |
| Posts: 264 |
| Location: Jacksonville, NC USA |
|
|
 |
I've never done much work on spring piston guns. I took a Chinese under lever apart a few years ago, cleaned it up and put it back together. Mostly just to get all the crap out of it that they put on them for shipping. I also did a clean up on a second hand RSW pistol (don't remember the model, it was the 'magnum' springer they still sell).
I'd like to try to learn how to tune springers for accuracy, reliability and power. What should I be looking at doing? Accuracy, I'd imagine, is mostly the same stuff as on anything else. Muzzle crown, lapped bore (but not too much), proper bedding of the action to the stock, the usual. But getting more flow through thew powerplant, I have limited ideas. Should I be upgrading seals? Springs?
Any reccomended reading on this?
Any help would be apreciated. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 2:15 pm |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
The best advice I can give you is don't go too far from the original design.... If you want more power, you need a bigger air chamber (bore and/or stroke).... With that, be prepared for more recoil, which means tougher on scopes, and harder to hit with....
I think the best shooting springers are in the moderate power range.... say 14-18 FPE.... Once you go over 20 FPE they tend to be a beast.... While springers exist in the 30 FPE catagory, I'd take a PCP of similar power any day....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:34 am |
|
|
| Slavia |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 31 Mar 2008 |
| Posts: 4382 |
| Location: Waseca, Minnesota, USA |
|
|
 |
| Quote: |
| I think the best shooting springers are in the moderate power range.... say 14-18 FPE |
I agree. I would go for smooth and accurate over beastly powerful. |
|
_________________
¡Listo! ¡Apunte! ¡Fuego! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:50 pm |
|
|
| jlwilliams |
| Veteran Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 02 Oct 2009 |
| Posts: 264 |
| Location: Jacksonville, NC USA |
|
|
 |
Good points. It's better to hit with 15 fpe than to miss with 30.
One reason I'm looking at getting the most performance out of a given springer powerplant is that I'd like to try some short barrels, and I don't want to lose effectiveness. (I'm really thinking of a few diferent projects, but one of them being a fold up backpacker that doesn't require any gas or backup equipment, more or less a pitol with a foldout stock, and I want it to be able to kill small game)
Maybe a question I should be asking is; how much barrel do I need relative to a spring piston's displacement? I've heard that springers are less barrel length dependant than CO2 or pneumatics, but what I've heard is mostly anecdotal and I don't have much to really base a plan of action on. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:10 am |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
I have never experimented.... but I have heard that barrels down to about 12" are OK for most springers.... They do get harder to cock though....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 1:22 am |
|
|
| kanyon |
| Silver Status Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 09 Aug 2008 |
| Posts: 1582 |
| Location: New Zealand |
|
|
 |
| jlwilliams wrote: |
Good points. It's better to hit with 15 fpe than to miss with 30.
One reason I'm looking at getting the most performance out of a given springer powerplant is that I'd like to try some short barrels, and I don't want to lose effectiveness. (I'm really thinking of a few diferent projects, but one of them being a fold up backpacker that doesn't require any gas or backup equipment, more or less a pitol with a foldout stock, and I want it to be able to kill small game)
Maybe a question I should be asking is; how much barrel do I need relative to a spring piston's displacement? I've heard that springers are less barrel length dependant than CO2 or pneumatics, but what I've heard is mostly anecdotal and I don't have much to really base a plan of action on. |
Hi..
A pellet will reach is max fps with in 200mm (8")
Thats all yer need...I have a few guns with 300mm (12") barrels.
they do get harder to cock...
 |
|
_________________ Career Infinity PCP .22
Webley Patriot .25
Hatsan mod 75 .22
Hatsan mod 99 .177 (Quattro & SAS)
Kral underlever .177
.............................................
. |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:12 pm |
|
|
| jlwilliams |
| Veteran Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 02 Oct 2009 |
| Posts: 264 |
| Location: Jacksonville, NC USA |
|
|
 |
| Maybe a side lever would be a good platform for that. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:33 pm |
|
|
| domer_pyle |
| Senior Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2009 |
| Posts: 523 |
|
|
|
 |
Was reading through some old threads, had to revive this one for a question that's plagued me for a while.
It's said a pellet reaches it's max velocity within X" of the barrel, well wouldn't this be a bit relative to the swept volume of the chamber? I'd assume the 5" travel of my B3-3 piston would cause the pellet to reach it's max speed much sooner in it's travel than the long piston stroke of my XL 1100.
Is there a formula for this? And if so would it just be to find the volume of the compression chamber and do some guess and check work with different barrel length numbers til getting the same number as the chamber volume?
I don't consider myself too much of a noob to AGs but with all the info on here I can't help but ask a lot of questions lol. Curiosity will be the death of me someday. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 9:47 pm |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
Just based on pure logic.... the greater the swept volume compared to the bore volume.... I would think the longer the optimum barrel length.... I kind of think of a springer as working like a PCP running at high pressure and very short valve duration.... A tiny bit of air is compressed and released in a very short period of time.... and in most springers, some combustion is said to take place, adding to the power as well.... This makes perfect sense when you look at the efficiency (FPE produced compared to the amount of air used).... Springers beat PCPs hands down....
The best efficiency I have measured in a .22 cal PCP was 1.92 FPE/CI air used (at 1 Bar).... A Diana 350 (B-28) has a swept volume of only 71 cc (4.3 CI) and yet produces up to 25 FPE in .22 cal.... That is 5.8 FPE/CI.... so clearly something unusual is happening.... whether it's the extra energy created by compressing the air (heat), combustion, or a combination of the two....
Generally, as the efficiency goes up, the need for a longer barrel (to expand the otherwise wasted air) decreases.... However, there still must be a relationship between swept volume in a springer and optimum barrel length....
Bob |
|
Last edited by rsterne on Sun Jun 05, 2011 11:05 pm; edited 1 time in total _________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 10:18 pm |
|
|
| domer_pyle |
| Senior Member |

|
 |
| Joined: 17 Sep 2009 |
| Posts: 523 |
|
|
|
 |
| Airgunning and quantum physics: the more you know the less you know and the more questions you have lol. Thanks though that is kinda helpful |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:44 am |
|
|
| Crosman140 |
| Senior Member |

 |
 |
| Joined: 13 Dec 2008 |
| Posts: 663 |
| Location: USA |
|
|
 |
| jlwilliams wrote: |
One reason I'm looking at getting the most performance out of a given springer powerplant is that I'd like to try some short barrels, and I don't want to lose effectiveness. (I'm really thinking of a few diferent projects, but one of them being a fold up backpacker that doesn't require any gas or backup equipment, more or less a pitol with a foldout stock, and I want it to be able to kill small game)
|
After reading this, I'm thinking that instead of modding a rifle to make it a carbine, mod a pistol into a backpacker's friend.
Seems like a 1322 is what would serve you best. Modded internally, they can give you amazing power, they are accurate, even with open sights and you can add a removable buttstock. And they make a very small carbine that is extremely light weight. Weight is something I consider a lot when hiking...I will be carrying this pack for hours and miles. I want to keep it as light as possible. |
|
_________________ My Critter Gitters
.22 Crosman 140 (1955)
.177 Crosman G1 (2009)
.177 Crosman 1377 (2009)
.177 Daisy 880 (2019)
BB Daisy Red Ryder (2012)
BB Daisy Buck (2019)
BB Crosman 1600 (1980)
BB Marksman 1010 (1979) |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:01 am |
|
|
| rsterne |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 15 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 2998 |
| Location: Coalmont, BC |
|
|
 |
Crosman 2289 if you can find a good one or existing stock.... Crosman has discontinued it....
Bob |
|
_________________ Dominion Marksman Silver Shield - 5890 x 6000 in 1976, and downhill ever since!
Airsonal: Too many to count! |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:05 pm |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
I cuold recommend that chinese Diana 48 clone. They have some room for experimenting but they tend to be quite pricey.
The idea being, that a Diana 48 comes with a reasonably short barrel, but with a big action. Technically, it could make for a good Bullpup because it doesn't have a lot of parts under the action. |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:32 pm |
|
|
| Alstone |
| Moderator & Site Supporter |

 |
 |
| Joined: 01 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 4139 |
| Location: Linconshire, ENGLAND |
|
|
 |
My AirArms TX200HC has a barrel only 9" long and is deadly accrate out to 30m, also the cocking is not to bad.
Al |
|
_________________
 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
 |  | | | |  |  |  |  | |  | |  |  |  |
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 2:18 pm |
|
|
| broommaster2000 |
| Moderator |

 |
 |
| Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
| Posts: 5714 |
| Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
 |
| I have a friend who also owns a TX200HC, and he puts em' tight past 50 yards! |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|  |  |  | | | |  |  |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|