| | | | | | | | | Under lever, side lever or standard break barrel? | | | | | |
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 5:52 pm |
|
|
AirGunEric |
Site Admin |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 6909 |
Location: "Out There" |
|
|
|
Other than picking up a RedRyder and cocking it with the under lever so you can pretend to be some 19th century Cowboy- who uses lever-cocked guns and what is the prevailing opinion of their advantages/disadvantages versus a regular break barrel? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:58 am |
|
|
broommaster2000 |
Moderator |
|
|
Joined: 10 Mar 2007 |
Posts: 5714 |
Location: City of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands |
|
|
|
The underlever provides more stability. Break barrels are more loosely attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:01 am |
|
|
AirGunEric |
Site Admin |
|
|
Joined: 20 Jan 2007 |
Posts: 6909 |
Location: "Out There" |
|
|
|
Sure- the pivots on break barrels loosen up after awhile causing barrel sag, crooked cocking stroke, etc.
I guess my question is more "why do you ['you' generically] prefer one vs. the other"? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:37 pm |
|
|
leadman |
Veteran Member |
|
|
Joined: 10 Feb 2007 |
Posts: 215 |
|
|
|
|
i prefer standard break barrels for the simple fact that they are alot simpler to work on but with an underlever or side lever ag the barrel is fixed so lock up isnt a problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Note: If you are seeing "Please enter your username and password to log in." Your browser cookies have been reset
or you need to register to access the topic in question. Use the 'Register' button near the top left of this page.
|